PISA_PT | Uma história de sucesso? Portugal e o PISA (2000-2015)
Major international studies, such as TIMSS, PISA, PIRLS or TALIS, have become these days one of the main governance technologies in the fields of education and training. In this set of studies, PISA is, surely, the one which exerts the greatest influence on political decision-makers, school administrators or the media. There is a vast international critical literature (e.g. Carnoy 2015; Komatsu & Rappleye 2017; Meyer & Benavot 2013; Pereyra, Kottoff & Cohen 2011) that has questioned this dimension of ‘global governance’. The works on Portugal´s participation in these studies, in particular PISA, are few and very restrict in their approaches (e.g. KNOWNandPOL project; CNE 2010, 2013).
Portugal has participated in PISA since its first cycle in 2000. This being a country of the European (semi)periphery which made a very belated expansion of mass schooling (Teodoro 2001), Portugal presented in all the cycles it participated up to 2012 results that fell below OECD average. In 2015, the results surpassed this average in the three domains analysed (Science, Mathematics and Reading) and Portugal is then presented by the OECD as a ‘success case’ in the context of the European (and developed) countries, with a consistent rise since 2006 (OECD 2016).
The research project analyses all cycles of Portugal’s participation in PISA (and, secondarily, in other international studies in which the country participated), comparing the processes adopted in data collection. Still, the core problem very directly formulated is: what are the implicit and explicit implications of Portugal’s participation in PISA; or, put differently, how have the different national players (policy-makers, school administrators, teachers and their unions, parents’ associations, media) appropriated the process and included the results of that participation in discourses, public policies and professional practices?
Although the unit of analysis in this study is the national space, the adopted methodologies will not be those of ‘methodological nationalism’. Research in education requires that one be aware that what is meant by ‘education’ is a complex of knowledge processes that are constructed in multiple scales – outside and inside the national borders (Robertson & Dale, 2008).
The team gathers researchers from various generations as well as scientific competencies and professional trajectories, among which the first director of GAVE, responsible for Portugal’s participation in the 2000, 2006 and 2006 cycles. As for consultants, these include the researchers responsible for the first study on Literacy in Portugal (Benavente et al. 1996), later politically responsible for Portugal’s participation in PISA, and a Brazilian researcher of INEP, the agency responsible for this Latin American country’s participation in PISA. The project takes advantage of the knowledge produced within the RIAIPE Network, where these issues have been the object of local and national studies.
FCT – 230.561,52€
- Ana Carita
- Ana Sofia Pereira de Amaral António
- António Neves Duarte Teodoro (Investigador Responsável)
- Carla Cristina Marques Galego
- Elsa Maria Bacala Estrela
- João José Gramaxo de Sampaio Maia
- Maria Glória Tavares Magalhães Ramalho
- Rosa Maria da Silva Serradas Duarte
- Sandra dos Anjos Canário Custódio Ribeiro
- Vitor Duarte Teodoro
01.03.2018 to 28.02.2021